And How to Fix It
When humans make decisions, we double-check information using a multi-layered process that evolved over millions of years.
We don’t just rely on memory or gut feeling — we blend personal memory, logical reasoning, external references, social feedback, and real-world sensory input to ensure our conclusions are correct.
This layered redundancy is exactly why humans avoid the kind of hallucinations that plague today’s large language models (LLMs).
It’s also the blueprint for the next evolution of AI and why technologies like A2SPA are critical to making autonomous agents trustworthy.
The Human Trust Stack
Think about how you validate information in daily life. When someone tells you something shocking, you naturally run it through multiple filters:
• Memory: Have I heard this before? Does it fit my past experiences?
• Logic: Does this even make sense? Are there contradictions?
• External Sources: Can I verify this through Google, a book, or another expert?
• Social Consensus: What do trusted friends or peers think?
• Sensory Reality: Does what I see, hear, or touch align with the claim?
Each layer acts like a trust checkpoint, similar to how cryptographic systems work.
If a piece of information fails at any step, it gets flagged, challenged, or discarded.
LLMs: A Single Weak Layer
Current LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini operate very differently.
They generate text by predicting the next most likely token based purely on statistical patterns.
There is no built-in fact-checking, no logic enforcement, no reality check just language patterns.
This makes them powerful at creativity but also prone to hallucinations, confidently outputting false or fabricated information.
It’s like having only the language layer of the human mind and ignoring memory, logic, and senses entirely.
This is why LLMs overpromise and underdeliver when deployed in mission-critical industries like finance, healthcare, and autonomous systems.
The results may sound correct, but they are unverified guesses.
Why Humans Don’t Hallucinate
Humans rarely fall into this trap because our cognition is multi-layered.
We don’t just say what “sounds right”we cross-check across memory, logic, group consensus, and reality before acting.
Imagine you hear a rumor:
• Your memory says, “I’ve never heard this before.”
• Your logic says, “That seems unlikely.”
• You Google it and find credible sources contradicting it.
• You ask a trusted friend, and they confirm it’s false.
• Finally, your own senses confirm there’s no evidence.
At every stage, there’s a chance to catch errors.
LLMs today lack this safety net. They are like a human brain stuck permanently on “first impression mode.”
The Solution: A Human-Like Verification Stack
To make AI trustworthy, we must replicate this human process inside machines.
Here’s what that stack could look like:
1. Memory Grounding — Persistent, verified knowledge storage.
2. Rule Engines — Logic-based filters to block impossible or contradictory outputs.
3. External Grounding — Live data sources to anchor facts in real-world truth.
4. Multi-Agent Consensus — Agents that debate and verify each other’s outputs.
5. Sensory APIs — Integration with sensors, APIs, and real-time data.
6. Cryptographic Verification (A2SPA) — Every input and output is signed and authenticated, guaranteeing it hasn’t been spoofed or tampered with.
flowchart TD
. A[User Input] — > B[LLM Generates Draft]
. B — > C[Rule Engine]
. C — >|Valid| D[External Knowledge Check]
. D — >|Verified| E[Multi-Agent Consensus]
. E — >|Consensus| F[Sensory / API Verification]
. F — >|Validated| G[Cryptographic Signing — A2SPA]
. G — >|Secure| H[Final Output to User]
. C — >|Invalid| I[Reject Output + Log Error]
This pipeline transforms today’s fragile single-layer AI into a secure, multi-layer system that thinks more like a human and verifies like a cryptographic machine.
Why A2SPA Matters
The final step — cryptographic signing — is where A2SPA (Agent-to-Secure Payload Authorization) comes in.
Every AI agent command, input, and output gets digitally signed, ensuring:
• It came from a trusted source.
• It hasn’t been altered by attackers.
• It’s authorized for execution.
This mirrors how humans trust not just believing the message but also verifying the messenger.
Without A2SPA or similar protocols, even the smartest AI stack remains vulnerable to agent hijacking and prompt injection attacks.
The Future of AI: Thinking Like Humans, Verifying Like Machines
The future of trustworthy AI isn’t about bigger models — it’s about smarter layers.
Just as humans evolved redundant trust mechanisms, AI needs its own:
1. Base model for creativity.
2. Logic engine for reason.
3. Live data checks for truth.
4. Consensus across agents for error detection.
5. Real-world integration for grounding.
6. Cryptographic trust layer to secure it all.
The end result?
AI systems that don’t just generate text, but think, verify, and protect making them safe for autonomous agents in healthcare, finance, national security, and beyond.
Right now, LLMs are like children telling stories, while humans are seasoned fact-checkers.
The companies that solve this verification problem will define the next era of AI.
What are your thoughts on this? Do you trust today’s AI to make decisions on your behalf — or does it need a human-style trust stack to truly earn that responsibility?
Reach out to discuss your business
https://aiblockchainventures.com
A message from our Founder
Hey, Sunil here. I wanted to take a moment to thank you for reading until the end and for being a part of this community.
Did you know that our team run these publications as a volunteer effort to over 3.5m monthly readers? We don’t receive any funding, we do this to support the community. ❤️
If you want to show some love, please take a moment to follow me on LinkedIn, TikTok, Instagram. You can also subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
And before you go, don’t forget to clap and follow the writer️!